🔗 Share this article

This move by the Democratic National Committee to block the public viewing regarding its own autopsy report concerning the last presidential race is stunning however not surprising. Resistant to hard truths, the DNC operates more like a PR firm than a political organization committed to building local power to secure victories.

A Climate That Avoids Dissent

Hesitant to depart from the prevailing attitude of conformity, the committee has continued within the Biden-Harris shadow all through this past year. Making public such a report might have shown that party leaders are interested to promote honest conversation about the strategic failures that enabled the former president to win re-election. However, the DNC is proceeding under the pretense that there are no lessons to be learned following the electoral catastrophe of 2024.

"Here’s our North Star: is this good for winning elections? If the answer is no, it becomes a sideline issue from what truly matters," a justification that has been offered for withholding the document.

Key Issues an Autopsy Would Have Explored

An autopsy report with any value would tackle head-on certain uncomfortable matters. Among them are:

• Electoral Disengagement: Losing of millions of voters that backed the party's candidate in 2020 was decisive in the narrowly decided 2024 election.
• A Insistence to Run: The determined choice of the incumbent to seek re-election, and an extremely delayed withdrawal, has been criticized as denying Democratic voters the chance for a competitive nomination process.
• Abandoning Core Democratic Voters: While facing rising costs, the campaign reportedly ceding to corporate donors' interests without successfully attempting to confront the effects of big business.
• The Gaza Factor: The refusal to reconsider an approach on a ongoing war is cited as driving away key demographic groups, particularly with youth voters, Arab American communities, and Muslim Americans.
• A Decline in Young Voter Support: Polling data indicates a major decline of Democratic support among voters aged 18-29.

A Pattern Shunning Scrutiny

Choosing secrecy aligns with a pattern of evading uncomfortable facts. This mirrors a dynamic in which virtually every Democratic officeholder in Washington acquiesced to an incumbent's determination to seeking another term until a poor public debate performance compelled a reversal.

Meanwhile, large majorities of Democratic voters had been repeatedly informing pollsters that they did not want the incumbent to run again.

Financial Questions

An honest analysis could examine matters regarding where money went, such as how much money went to party strategists and media firms during an electoral effort that managed to spend a colossal sum during the general election.

The Broader Issue

Ultimately, the blockage surrounding this report highlights an allegiance toward the established hierarchy that oversaw an unsuccessful national race. The signal for ordinary supporters – including countless small donors – is that they cannot have a right to know what party chiefs claim to have learned from an analysis compiled from feedback from all states.

A political entity incapable to critically review its mistakes finds it difficult to break free from the pattern that ended up being so advantageous to the winning candidate.